Deadline for Morocco’s defense at tas in can 2025 final dispute

The Moroccan Football Federation (FRMF) has until May 7 to submit its defense to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (TAS) regarding the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations (CAN) final dispute. This deadline follows the TAS formally acknowledging the appeal filed by the Senegalese Football Federation (FSF) against both the FRMF and the Confederation of African Football (CAF).

As per procedural rules, the appellant (FSF) was granted a 20-day window to file its appeal brief, outlining its legal arguments. The respondents (FRMF and CAF) now have an equal period to counter these claims. However, the FSF has requested a procedure suspension, which has prevented the TAS from establishing a definitive timeline or scheduling any potential hearing.

Reliable sources indicate that the FRMF is crafting a robust legal defense, meticulously prepared with confidence in a favorable outcome. The TAS has emphasized its capability to handle such disputes, noting the involvement of specialized and independent arbitrators. Matthieu Reeb, the TAS Secretary General, stated: “The TAS is fully equipped to resolve this dispute fairly, with arbitrators ensuring both efficiency and adherence to due process. We recognize the urgency for all parties—teams and fans alike—to receive a final decision promptly.”

The FSF is challenging the CAF Appeal Jury‘s March 17 decision, which upheld Senegal’s forfeit victory in the final. This followed a FRMF appeal regarding the application of Articles 82 and 84 of the competition’s regulations.

On January 18, the day of the final, Senegalese players walked off the field for 16 minutes at the instruction of their coach, Pape Thiaw, protesting a stoppage-time penalty awarded to Morocco.

key points of the legal battle

• FSF’s appeal: Filed against the FRMF and CAF, seeking to overturn the final’s outcome.
• CAF’s ruling: Upheld the forfeit victory for Senegal after Morocco’s protest.
• FRMF’s deadline: Until May 7 to submit its defense to the TAS.
• Procedural suspension: FSF’s request delays the establishment of a hearing schedule.
• Regulatory basis: Dispute centers on Articles 82 and 84 of the CAN 2025 competition regulations.