A former pastef official on why he lost faith in ousmane sonko’s leadership

My decision to join PASTEF was never motivated by a quest for a position, privileges, or public recognition. Instead, I entered the movement driven by a deep conviction: to actively contribute to the birth of a Senegal that upheld greater justice, transparency, and a profound respect for the rule of law. This commitment reflects a broader dedication to robust African politics, a key focus in current Africa news and pan-African journalism.

I personally experienced the challenging years of political activism, enduring clandestine gatherings, threats, and significant personal sacrifices. I witnessed men and women willingly abandon their comfort, and at times their personal safety, to champion an ideal that resonated deeply within us all.

When our political agenda finally propelled us into power, I genuinely believed that the most difficult phase was behind us. I was convinced that the time had finally arrived to govern with humility, steadfastly respecting institutions and dedicating ourselves exclusively to the service of the Senegalese populace.

However, my firm convictions gradually began to crumble. I observed a progressive closing off of internal debate within the party. Dissent became increasingly suspect, and critical thinking, which is undeniably vital for any truly democratic organization, appeared less and less tolerated. Many opted for silence, while others quietly distanced themselves, sometimes out of sheer exhaustion, at other times due to profound disappointment.

It was at this critical juncture that I understood the principal danger was no longer solely external, stemming from our political adversaries. It could, in fact, originate from our own internal mechanisms and operational dynamics.

Subsequently, I noted an increasingly clear divergence between two distinct approaches to exercising power. On one hand, there was the President of the Republic, fulfilling the responsibilities constitutionally vested in that office. On the other, a political leadership whose influence, in my view, seemed to transcend the defined boundaries of a mere party head. This dynamic raised significant questions about Ousmane Sonko’s leadership.

In my judgment, such a duality could not function effectively or sustainably without inevitably creating considerable tension. Senegal did not elect a singular, indispensable leader; it chose republican institutions. Within a Republic, no individual, however popular they may be, should, in my opinion, ever overshadow the fundamental rules that form the bedrock of the state.

While public discourse often becomes fixated on individual personalities, the daily struggles of ordinary Senegalese citizens persist: the escalating cost of living, pervasive youth unemployment, challenges in education and healthcare, agricultural development, and the critical need for investment and wealth creation. Public action and policy should be squarely focused on addressing these vital national concerns.

My commitment has never been a pledge of allegiance to a specific individual. It has always been, and remains, a profound dedication to unwavering principles. Individuals are transient; the Republic and its enduring institutions remain.

Therefore, when loyalty to a personality begins to eclipse one’s loyalty to the Republic, it becomes imperative for every individual to conscientiously reflect on their stance.

I am not writing these words out of bitterness or resentment. I compose them with a deep sense of gravity, because I refuse to abandon the core values that initially compelled my engagement in public life.

I will continue to serve Senegal with the same unwavering commitment: to articulate what I believe to be just, to vigorously defend our institutions, and to consistently prioritize the national interest above all partisan considerations. History will ultimately pass judgment on individuals, but our conscience renders its verdict every single day.