A true ‘thriller’ is undoubtedly the most fitting description for the dramatic narrative of the 2026 World Cup third-place match between France and England, played Saturday evening in Miami. Sky Sports, understandably, lauded the Three Lions’ triumph with an astonishing 6-4 scoreline, securing them a third-place finish at the World Cup—their first podium placement since their 1966 victory. However, it was the entirety of the match and its captivating twists that left the media spellbound.
‘Thriller’ was also the chosen headline for the Daily Mail this Sunday morning. “A tennis score, not football,” the English newspaper remarked. Across the Channel, the focus naturally centered on England’s performance, especially after their semi-final elimination by Argentina, despite holding a lead with less than ten minutes remaining. Thomas Tuchel, notably, faced jeers from British supporters in Miami ahead of the third-place encounter.
Tuchel’s vindication
For Tuchel, this paradoxical victory served as a form of vindication, silencing the boos that marred his image before kick-off and the torrent of criticism he endured since the semi-final defeat. Journalist Craig Hope observed, “He delivers England their best World Cup result since 1966, not quite the promised second star, but a maiden bronze medal.” In his own way, because it was “all or nothing.”
In France, two key points dominated the post-match discussion: Didier Deschamps’ farewell and the French team’s subpar first-half display. Vincent Duluc, writing for L’Equipe, summarized the Bleus as “ridiculous then light to finish,” describing two periods that were “contradictory and crazy, equally unfathomable, in terms of both vertical drop and comeback.” Pundits struggled to dissect a France squad capable of both the worst and the best within 90 minutes of an undeniably historic match, yet one that left a bitter taste.
Le Parisien characterized the Bleus’ departure as a “stunning final match” but one filled with a “suitcase of regrets”: “Football is a sport where any team can beat another, and it’s played not with the feet but with the head. The French saw Miami, the city where Leo Messi maintains his amazing health, but their thoughts were elsewhere, mainly on sadness, or rather annihilation.” It was as if everything had shattered with their semi-final elimination against Spain, a match where the Bleus failed to compete. It took a desperate effort to reconnect the threads for the machine to restart… but too late.
“Shame then revolt,” declared Le Figaro, while Libération spoke of a “frenzied encounter,” or one that made you want to tear your hair out. Ouest France dedicated its coverage to an “extraordinary France-England World Cup match.”
Mbappé’s bittersweet achievement
“A third and fourth place we won’t soon forget!” Marca added to its headline, referencing the match score like a tennis set. The Madrid daily even called the “consolation final” a “masterpiece.” “Who said this match served no purpose? France and England undoubtedly gave us the most entertaining game of the World Cup,” the Spanish newspaper wrote. This was alongside several articles on Real Madrid star Kylian Mbappé, who became the competition’s all-time leading scorer with his brace—pending Lionel Messi’s potential response in the Spain-Argentina final.
“Mbappé’s bitter achievement,” headlined AS, Madrid’s other sports newspaper, which echoed the sentiment regarding the evening’s narrative: “Those who say the World Cup third-place match is useless are mistaken. It serves, for example, to bid farewell to a team built to win everything but which only claimed two titles out of seven contested—Deschamps’ team—but also to solidify Mbappé’s place in history for his goals, not his titles, even if he enters the Pantheon of World Cup top scorers tonight.”
In Catalonia, while acknowledging Mbappé’s statistical performance in this World Cup, Sport and Mundo Deportivo both highlighted “England triumphant in madness” as they secured the bronze medal, achieving their first World Cup podium finish since their solitary triumph in 1966.
In Germany, where the World Cup journey ended prematurely against Paraguay, the media adopted an undeniably German perspective, almost claiming the English victory: “Tuchel humiliates Mbappé,” Bild titled, though it did note the French player’s new record. The German newspaper primarily focused on the first-half drama. Die Welt took a more measured approach, headlining an “epic match,” a “ten-goal festival.” Kicker also remained understated, simply calling it a “spectacular match.” That, at least, is an understatement.
More Stories
Mali faces worsening insecurity as attacks persist despite foreign military support
Senegal’s judiciary closes the long-standing case of gendarme didier badji’s disappearance
Cameroon-AfDB partnership: strong financial commitments face disbursement hurdles