August 26, 2026

The Panafrican Press

English-language platform committed to rigorous, independent journalism across the African continent.

Senegal’s kiiraay party slams sonko over 3.7 billion cfa spending

Senegal’s Kiiraay Party Accuses Ousmane Sonko of ‘Scandalous’ 3.7 Billion FCFA Spending

Senegal’s Kiiraay Les Patriotes Républicains party has leveled serious allegations against former Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko, accusing him of misusing public funds allocated for peace initiatives in the Casamance region.

In a statement released on 25 August 2026, the party condemned what it described as unaccounted expenditures totaling 3.7 billion FCFA from the ‘Jamm pour la Paix en Casamance’ fund between 2025 and 2026. The party argues that these funds were diverted from their intended purpose, which was to support peace efforts in the conflict-prone region.

Allegations of Misuse of Public Funds

The Kiiraay Les Patriotes Républicains party has accused Ousmane Sonko of using the ‘Jamm pour la Paix en Casamance’ fund for purposes unrelated to its original mandate. According to the party, Sonko allegedly justified part of the spending by citing the purchase of vehicles and the renovation of an administrative building—expenses they claim have no direct link to peacebuilding efforts in the Casamance.

The party’s statement highlights a perceived inconsistency in the government’s commitment to transparency, arguing that public funds should be subject to the same scrutiny regardless of who manages them. ‘Transparency must not be selective,’ the party declared, emphasizing the need for accountability in the use of state resources.

Legal and Political Context

These accusations follow a Constitutional Council ruling that deemed unconstitutional a law passed by the national assembly—then dominated by the PASTEF party—to regulate special funds. While the political fallout continues, Ousmane Sonko has yet to respond publicly to the allegations.

The Casamance, a region plagued by decades of conflict, has long been a focal point for peace initiatives. Critics argue that misallocation of funds intended for reconciliation efforts undermines trust in government institutions and prolongs instability in the area.